Skip to content
CAAIL

By the Numbers

A live snapshot of the library — how much it covers, where it’s deep, and (just as usefully) where it’s thin. The gaps are not hidden: sparse species pages and short coverage bars are the clearest places to contribute. All figures are regenerated from the canonical Markdown on every build.

303Papers
139Software tools
147Databases
205Datasets
14Talks

Research coverage

The matrix maps 25 AI methods against 7 research areas — 64 of 175 cells (36.6%) carry at least one paper. Where the bars are short, the field (and this library) is still thin.

Media Optimization 23
Cellular Engineering 33
Bioprocess & Scale-Up 29
Scaffolding 8
Sensory Prediction 23
AI Tooling / Methodology 66
AI Evaluation & Benchmarking 22

Most-used methods

Deep Learning 25
Benchmarks & Evaluation Frameworks 22
Ensemble Learning 20
Domain-Specific Biomedical Agents 17
Bayesian Optimization 12
CNN 12
Genetic Algorithms 11
SVM 11
GNN 10
Scientific Literature & Discovery Agents 10

Datasets by species — where help is wanted

205 catalogued datasets across 17 pages — 164 per-species inventory rows, 24 on the reference pages, 17 benchmark datasets. Every species page now has at least one catalogued deposit. The counts below show where coverage is thinnest (Goat, Turkey, Duck carry the fewest), the best place to deepen the library. See Contributing to add a deposit.

Cow 34
Fish 32
Pig 27
Crustacean 21
Chicken 14
Mollusk 14
Sheep 6
Duck 4
Turkey 3
Goat 2

Momentum

1dsince newest paper added
15Papers.md commits · 30 days
6dsince newest dataset added
14Datasets commits · 30 days

Linked external resources are independent of TUCCA and Tufts University and remain under their own licenses.

Last updated: